Call us at 877-377-6452 or Have us Call You

ContractPal Blog

Archive for the ‘Legal’ Category

Where’s the Risk in Electronic Signatures?

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Document magazine has a very informative article on the risks of using electronic signatures.  The article is written by Gregory T. Casamento and Patrick J. Hatfield from Lcoke Lord Bissell & Liddel LLP.

I like the article because it does a good job of addressing a common mistake that businesses or organizations make when considering or creating an electronic signature solution.   That mistake is to view the requirements for an electronic signature solution solely as technical, to be solved by the IT department.   Ignoring the other requirements, or risks as identified in the article may result in a electronic signatures that are not enforceable.

Companies like American Express and Dillards have learned the hard way that their internally built systems did not stand up in court, although technically they did have electronic signatures.

The six risks identified are Authentication, Repudiation, Compliance, Admissibility, Adoption and Relative.  Check back in the coming days as we go into how to mitigate each of these risks.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • YahooBuzz
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn

SaaS to the Rescue

Monday, April 6th, 2009

Recently, Dillards learned first hand why using an electronic contract automation Software as a Service like ContractPal is important (Kerr vs. Dillard Store Services).

On their Intranet, Dillards offers various employment related agreements including an arbitration agreement.  An employee, Yolanda Kerr didn’t want to sign the agreement. Apparently a manager, who had the rights to manage Yolanda’s password reset it and somehow during the process, the arbitration agreement got signed.

The Kansas US District Court considering the matter held that the agreement was unenforceable because Dillards couldn’t meet their burden of proof to establish that Kerr had signed the agreement. Not only did the court hold that Dillards couldn’t prove the Kerr signed the agreement but also that Dillards couldn’t prove that she may have done so by accident or mistake.

Whether the arbitration agreement was enforceable wouldn’t have been an issue had Dillards used ContractPal. Employers who use ContractPal don’t have access to change user passwords. Only employees can reset their own passwords, and when dealing with personal agreements like employment related agreements, agreements can be associated with personal profiles to improve their enforceability. In addition, an agreement on ContractPal cannot be signed by accident or mistake. Agreements are directly presented to users in a fully enforceable signing ceremony.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • YahooBuzz
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn

Don’t Use a Pickup when a Dump Truck is Needed

Friday, March 27th, 2009

The other day I saw a guy driving a pickup so loaded with dirt that sparks flew from the back bumper every time he went through a small dip in the road. I followed him for a while until he was forced to pull over. His back axle broke.

Seeing this, I immediately saw the analog to our business, electronic contract processing. The guy in the pickup should have hired someone with dump truck to carry his load.

I see people attempting to build contract applications using the equivalent of  a pickup when they need a dump truck.

Take I9 forms for example. I have heard of several employers building their own  electronic systems. Hopefully, they won’t find out that they’re driving a pickup that breaks down. Successfully implementing an electronic I9 form requires compliance with 27 different, and frequently onerous governmental requirements, many dealing with auditing, electronic signatures and their application, system availability and workflow.

To those doing this, I can only shout–your pickup is likely to break. And when it does, you’re likely to get fined and could even end up in jail. Why do that when you can use ContractPal to deliver what you need in record time and for less money than you would have spent, and without the endless worries.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • YahooBuzz
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn

Avoid the traffic jams! Go green!

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

I have a friend that works as an attorney for the Washington DC court system. He lives north of town near the beltway and works at an office near his home. Unfortunately, a significant amount of his work involves submitting paperwork at the courthouse in downtown DC. He ends up taking the documents himself because of signature requirements while at the court.

We were talking at dinner one night about what I do for a living and he became quite interested in how ContractPal’s service could eliminate the pain and frustration of driving to the court. He asked if ContractPal’s solution was legal and if it would stand up in a court of law? I answered yes. ContractPal’s platform was built with ESIGN and UETA in mind. Using the solution is green, it saves on time, it reduces travel frustration, it saves on cost and it is available to all parties of the transaction indefinitely.

I’m interested to see where this goes from here.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • YahooBuzz
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn

Paper is “easier and safer” than electronic signatures…. NOT!

Monday, March 16th, 2009

HRTechNews.com has a post on their blog today that reminded me that I have lots of work to do in converting the masses to the better life of electronic signatures and online agreements.

The blog recounts the case of Kerr vs. Dillard Store Services, Inc.   In this case the company argued that the employee had signed an agreement to arbitrate discrimination claims.  The company used their own email and intranet system to post the agreement and capture the employee’s electronic signature.

But the employee successfully argued that she had not signed the agreement.  She said that her manager, who had reset her password, signed it.  The company admitted that was possible and the judge agreed with the employee.

So, what is the lesson learned from this?  HRTechNews stated that “In most cases, it’s easier and safer to have legal documents signed on physical paper.”

What???!

Using online forms and electronic signatures is not only easier and safer than paper but it typically costs 50% less AND provides a better user experience!

The lesson that should be learned here is that if you are taking your forms and agreements online, and you should be, make sure that you are tapping into expertise that will ensure your electronic signatures are enforceable.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • YahooBuzz
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn